Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;319(3):G333–G344. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00150.2019

Table 1.

Anthropometric and biochemical measurements of WT and Sulf2-KO mice fed either standard chow or fast food diet

Standard Chow Diet
Fast-Food Diet
Parameters WT
(n = 11)
Sulf2-KO
(n = 12)
WT
(n = 12)
Sulf2-KO
(n = 11)
P Value* P Value**
Initial weight, g 22.2 ± 1.1 17.7 ± 0.9 21.5 ± 1.4 17.7 ± 0.7 0.7 0.02
Final weight, g 43.1 ± 3.7 29.1 ± 1.5 65.3 ± 3.3 44.7 ± 4.7 <0.0001 0.0002
Percent weight gain, % 93.1 ± 11.9 65.3 ± 5.5 207.6 ± 13.0 144.7 ± 19.7 <0.0001 0.002
Liver-to-body wt ratio, % 3.2 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.2 4.8 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 0.7 0.01 0.2
Adipose-to-body wt ratio, % 4.7 ± 0.4 3.1 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 0.9 7.6 ± 1.1 0.02 0.8
Glucose, mg/dL 144.7 ± 6.2 134.3 ± 5.4 209.7 ± 10.3 182.0 ± 3.6 <0.0001 0.01
Insulin, IU/mL 21.4 ± 4.4 20.2 ± 3.5 74.1 ± 12.7 48.9 ± 12.0 <0.0001 0.06
HOMA-IR, % 7.4 ± 1.4 6.8 ± 1.3 38.2 ± 6.6 22.0 ± 5.4 <0.0001 0.01
GH, ng/mL 5.6 ± 0.2 9.8 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.6 <0.0001 <0.0001

Data are presented as means ± SE; n, number of mice. GH, growth hormone; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.

*

P value of WT mice fed standard chow diet vs. fast-food diet.

**

P value of WT vs. Sulf2-KO mice fed fast-food diet.