Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;4(9):e2020GH000271. doi: 10.1029/2020GH000271

Table 1.

Review of the Environmental and Human Health Impacts in the Region of the Aral Sea Basin

Authors Study area(s) Health assessment Environmental assessment Findings (health) Findings (environmental) Study limitations
Bennion et al. (2007) Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan Questionnaire‐based assessment of household exposures and self‐reported respiratory health (asthma, allergic rhinitis, pneumonia) Dust deposition rates (PM10 and PM2.5) within 5 km of study populations Some evidence for an inverse relationship between FEV1 and dust exposure, but no significant relationship was found Highest rates of dust deposition occurred during the summer months and in the region closest to the original shoreline Unable to test difference between asthma and allergic rhinitis
Cross‐sectional study does not allow for testing for children with wheezing
No significant variation between PM10 and PM2.5 fractions
Pulmonary function (FEV1) collected via portable spirometer
Crighton et al. (2003) Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan Questionnaire‐based assessment of perceived environment, social support networks, psychosocial health, and self‐rated somatic health (general) None High rates of poor self‐rated health None Lower‐than‐expected ratings of poor health and environmental may be due to mass out‐migration from the region, leaving behind individuals who were less oncerned about these issues
Respondents were more likely to have poor self‐rated health if they were concerned about environmental problems and had an intermediate or higher education level
Indoitu et al. (2015) Aral Sea region None Remote sensing observations (satellite imagery, ozone mapping spectrometry) to track frequency, size, and sources of dust storms andaerosol concentrations over the region None The Aral Sea dry lake bed has been a strong source of dust emissions since 2000 and has included the northern and southern desert areas as dust sources Absence of meteorological monitoring stations on the dried Aral Sea surface
Dust storm frequency, composition, and structure have changed as a result of the Aral Sea desiccation process
Dust emissions originating from the Aralkum desert are capable of traveling hundreds of kilometers
Kaneko et al. (2003) Kazalinsk District, Kazakhstan and control area Questionnaire‐based assessment of overall health, gastrointestinal symptoms None Significantly higher prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal renal labs in children living in the Aral Sea region vs. control None Unknown specific cause for renal tubular dysfunction found in the study area
Renal tubular cell injury as measured by urine sampling
Kunii et al. (2010) Kazalinsk District, Kazakhstan and control area Questionnaire‐based assessment of household exposures and respiratory symptoms (pneumonia, chest infection, wheeze) None Significantly higher prevalence of wheeze and restrictive pulmonary dysfunction among subjects in the Aral Sea region compared to those living farther away None Confounding factors related to measurement bias during questionnaire administration and weather‐related variability in pulmonary function performance
No significant difference for asthma or obstructive pulmonary dysfunction
O'Hara et al. (2000) Eastern Turkmenistan None Airborne dust deposition rates (PM10) and physical/chemical composition None Dust deposition rates were higher in desert monitoring sites than those closer to the Aral Sea None noted
At sites near irrigated areas, PM10 values were greater
High levels of phosphalone (organophosphate) contamination were found across sites and were highest in irrigated areas despite the cessation of pesticide spraying
Wiggs et al. (2003) Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan Questionnaire‐based assessment of household exposures and respiratory symptoms (chronic cough, wheeze, asthma) Dust deposition rates (PM10) within 5 km of study populations Children living closer to the former shoreline had a lower prevalence of respiratory health problems compared to main agricultural and urban areas Summer months experienced conditions (i.e., temperature, precipitation, and wind patterns) that were conducive to increased sediment erosion and dust transport, especially in the northern portion of the study area Likelihood that dust is not the only environmental factor that may cause changes in human health
Dust deposition data indicates multiple potential sources of dust
Pulmonary function (FEV1) collected via electronic volume‐flow spirometer
Monthly aggregate data may mask short‐term effects on health caused by single dust events
During the dusty season, deposition rates of PM10 far exceeded US EPA standards