Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;7(18):2000621. doi: 10.1002/advs.202000621

Figure 4.

Figure 4

a) Desalination capacity of Ti3C2T x /Ag‐3 at specific currents of 20, 30, 50, and 100 mA g−1. b) Comparison of the desalination capacity of Ti3C2T x /Ag‐3, Ti3C2T x /Ag‐6, Ti3C2T x /Ag‐9, and Ti3C2T x /Ag‐12 at various specific currents. c) Contrast of energy consumption and chloride ion removal rates of the four kinds of materials at a specific current of 50 mA g−1. d) Cycling performance of Ti3C2T x /Ag‐3 at a specific current of 100 mA g−1. e) Comparison of the desalination capacity and rate among the different electrodes. f) Power‐law relationship between peak current and scan rates for Ti3C2T x /Ag‐3. g) Desalination mechanism of the Ti3C2T x /Ag electrode for electrochemical desalination.