Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;7(18):2000486. doi: 10.1002/advs.202000486

Table 3.

Estimation of tree performances over several groups of patients, obtained from the colorectal and breast cancer cohorts

Specificity Sensitivity
Estimation 95% CI Estimation 95% CI
CRC decision tree
Training set—Patients used for tree building N = 527 (CRC + healthy)
0.87 [0.79–0.92] 0.76 [0.67–0.85]
Testing set—Patients not used for tree building N = 424 (CRC + healthy)
0.89 [0.84–0.94] 0.77 [0.73–0.80]
CRC stages 0/I/II versus healthy
0.87 [0.83–0.91] 0.72 [0.67–0.76]
Breast cancer patients N = 278 versus healthy
0.90 [0.84–0.95] 0.58 [0.50–0.65]
Breast cancer decision tree
Training set—Patients used for tree building N = 236 (breast cancer + healthy)
0.72 [0.65–0.84] 0.86 [0.80–0.91]
Testing set—Patients not used for tree building N = 46 (breast cancer + healthy)
0.80 [0.64–0.95] 0.95 [0.85–1]
CRC patients N = 951 versus healthy
0.66 [0.62–0.72] 0.85 [0.82–0.87]

a, The confidence intervals were obtained using the empirical bootstrap method.