Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;20:906. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07356-5

Table 1.

Definitions of the WHO 2017 and 2010 grading classification for p-NENs and distributions of patients in the present study according to these two criteria

Definitions Distributions
Classification Mitotic rateA Ki-67 proliferation index (%)B Cases(%)
WHO 2017 grading criteria [7]
Well-differentiated p-NENs:
NET G1 < 2 < 3 150 (31.3%)
NET G2 2–20 3–20 158 (32.9%)
NET G3 > 20 > 20 64 (13.3%)
Poorly-differentiated p-NENs:
    NEC G3 (small cell and large cell subtypes) > 20 > 20 108 (22.5%)
WHO 2010 grading criteria [8]
 Well-differentiated endocrine tumor, G1:
       NET G1 < 2 < 3 150 (31.3%)
 Well-differentiated endocrine tumor, G2:
       NET G2 2–20 3–20 158 (32.9%)
 Poorly-differentiated neoplasm: neuroendocrine carcinoma, G3 (small cell and large cell type):
       “NEC G3” > 20 > 20 172 (35.8%)

A: The mitotic rate is based on the evaluation of mitoses in 50 high power fields in areas of higher density, and is expressed as mitoses per 10 high power fields

B: The Ki-67 proliferation index is based on the evaluation of ≥500 cell in areas of higher nuclear labeling (hot spot)

Abbreviation: WHO World Health Organization; p-NENs Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms; NET Neuroendocrine tumors; NEC Neuroendocrine carcinoma; G Grading