Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;20:311. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01457-y

Table 2.

Colorectal polyps in the study participants

Parameter CEMR
(n = 71)
UEMR
(n = 71)
Total
(n = 142)
P value
Median Size, (IQR, mm) 5.0 (4.0–7.0) 6.0 (5.0–8.0) 6.0 (4.0–7.0) 0.061a
Location, n (%) 0.612b
 Ascending colon 16 (22.5) 13 (18.3) 28 (20.4)
 Transverse colon 17 (23.9) 21 (29.6) 38 (26.8)
 Descending colon 5 (7.1) 6 (8.4) 11 (7.7)
 Sigmoid colon 28 (39.4) 22 (31.0) 50 (35.2)
 Rectum 5 (7.1) 9 (12.7) 14 (9.9)
Morphology, n (%) 0.339b
 0-Is 50 (70.4) 54 (76.1) 104 (73.2)
 0-Ip 0 (0.0) 1 (1.4) 1 (0.7)
 0-IIa 21 (29.6) 16 (22.5) 37 (26.1)
Neoplastic polyps, n (%) 0.618b
 Tubular 47 (66.2) 48 (67.6) 95 (66.9)
 Tubulovillous or villous 0 (0.0) 2 (2.8) 2 (1.4)
 SSA 1 (1.4) 1 (1.4) 2 (1.4)
Other polyps, n (%)
 Hyperplastic polyps 13 (18.3) 9 (12.7) 22 (15.5)
 Inflammatory polyps 10 (14.1) 11 (15.5) 21 (14.8)

CEMR conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, UEMR underwater endoscopic mucosal resection, SSA sessile serrated adenoma

a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. b Chi-square test