Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;11(9):5181–5196. doi: 10.1364/BOE.399506

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of local HOC metric and local GA growth rate along the margin of GA for Case 4. (A) Sub-RPE OCT projection at baseline; black contours correspond to the lesion margin at baseline, and red contours correspond to the lesion margin at follow-up. (B) HOC projection at baseline. (C) HOC projection, with excluded regions colored teal. (D) Local HOC metric mapped along the baseline GA margin. For visualization, the HOC metric has been normalized between [0,1], with the same normalization used for all cases. (E, F) Enlargements of panel D. (G) Local GA growth rates mapped along the baseline GA margin. (H, I) Enlargements of panel G. Qualitatively, this case has an appreciable spatial correlation between the local HOC metric and the local GA growth rate.