Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;15(9):e0237427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237427

Table 1. Qualitative methods of data collection.

Focus Group Discussions (FGD) N
    Bus driversa 1
    Community Advisory Board membersb 2
    Youthb 1
Total FGDs 4
In-Depth Interviews (IDI) N
Men directly engaged with PrEP 34
    PrEP initiators (men who started PrEP) 8
    PrEP continuers (men who continued PrEP over some weeks or months) 14
    PrEP decliners (men who went through the risk assessment process and declined PrEP) 5
    PrEP discontinuers (men who took PrEP for some time and abandoned it) 5
    PrEP re-initiators (men who started PrEP, paused, and re-started PrEP) 1
    PrEP deferrers (men who had to delay PrEP due to health issues) 1
Male PrEP providers (health care workers) 10
Male stakeholders (public health implementers, national and international NGOs and networks) 7
Male community leaders (chiefs, village heads, headmen, members of local committees) 14
Total IDIs with men 65