Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;40(39):7436–7450. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1129-20.2020

Table 1.

Detailed information for the strength and relative latency of FS and SS in different layersa

FS index
SS index
Relative latency of FS
Relative latency of SS
Mean ± SEM No. of sites Mean ± SEM No. of sites Mean ± SEM (ms) No. of sites Mean ± SEM (ms) No. of sites
L2/3 0.23±0.02 115 0.28±0.01 115 20.51±1.66 82 44.70±1.48 112
L4B 0.46±0.04 29 0.17±0.02 29 18.07±3.00 27 46.32±3.62 25
L4Cα 0.72±0.02 68 0.07±0.01 68 11.35±0.44 68 60.32±6.05 31
L4Cβ 0.47±0.02 57 0.10±0.01 57 21.31±1.30 55 61.03±5.10 31
L5 0.39±0.03 63 0.23±0.02 63 18.25±1.64 55 46.81±2.18 54
L6 0.59±0.03 52 0.12±0.01 52 14.94±1.25 51 58.82±5.73 34

aThe FS and SS index was defined as the maximum value of mean strength. The latency was defined as the time at which each component first reached 2 × SDs of baseline fluctuations (−20 ms to 10 ms of raw dynamic response). Relative latency was defined as the latency difference between FS and excitation (latency of FS minus latency of excitation) and SS and excitation (latency of SS minus latency of excitation).