Table 1.
FS index |
SS index |
Relative latency of FS |
Relative latency of SS |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SEM | No. of sites | Mean ± SEM | No. of sites | Mean ± SEM (ms) | No. of sites | Mean ± SEM (ms) | No. of sites | |
L2/3 | 0.23±0.02 | 115 | 0.28±0.01 | 115 | 20.51±1.66 | 82 | 44.70±1.48 | 112 |
L4B | 0.46±0.04 | 29 | 0.17±0.02 | 29 | 18.07±3.00 | 27 | 46.32±3.62 | 25 |
L4Cα | 0.72±0.02 | 68 | 0.07±0.01 | 68 | 11.35±0.44 | 68 | 60.32±6.05 | 31 |
L4Cβ | 0.47±0.02 | 57 | 0.10±0.01 | 57 | 21.31±1.30 | 55 | 61.03±5.10 | 31 |
L5 | 0.39±0.03 | 63 | 0.23±0.02 | 63 | 18.25±1.64 | 55 | 46.81±2.18 | 54 |
L6 | 0.59±0.03 | 52 | 0.12±0.01 | 52 | 14.94±1.25 | 51 | 58.82±5.73 | 34 |
aThe FS and SS index was defined as the maximum value of mean strength. The latency was defined as the time at which each component first reached 2 × SDs of baseline fluctuations (−20 ms to 10 ms of raw dynamic response). Relative latency was defined as the latency difference between FS and excitation (latency of FS minus latency of excitation) and SS and excitation (latency of SS minus latency of excitation).