Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;40(10):927–946. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00934-2

Table 1.

Summary of the effect of demographic factors/disease/food on doravirine pharmacokinetics

Factor Dosing Comparison Doravirine GMR (90% CI) Reference
AUC0–∞ AUC0–24 Cmax C24
Age Doravirine 100 mg SD Elderly men/young men 0.85 (0.67–1.10) 0.92 (0.73–1.16) 0.81 (0.59–1.11) [22]
Doravirine 100 mg SD Elderly women/young women 0.97 (0.79–1.19) 1.18 (0.98–1.42) 0.94 (0.72–1.21) [22]
Gender Doravirine 100 mg SD Women/men 1.20 (1.03–1.40) 1.42 (1.23–1.64) 1.02 (0.84–1.24) [22]
Hepatic impairment Doravirine 100 mg SD Moderate hepatic impairment/normal hepatic function 0.99 (0.72–1.35) 0.93 (0.74–1.18) 0.90 (0.66–1.24) 0.99 (0.74–1.33) [25]
Renal impairment Doravirine 100 mg SD Severe renal impairment/normal renal function 1.43 (1.00–2.04) 0.83 (0.61–1.15) 1.38 (0.99–1.92) [24]
Food Doravirine 100 mg SD Fed/fasted 1.16 (1.06–1.26) 1.03 (0.89–1.19) 1.36 (1.19–1.55) [23]
Doravirine 100 mg/lamivudine 300 mg/TDF 300 mg SD Fed/fasted 1.10 (1.01–1.20) 0.95 (0.80–1.12) 1.26 (1.13–1.41) [23]

AUC024 area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to 24 h, AUC0 area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity, C24 plasma concentration 24 h post-dose, CI confidence interval, Cmax maximum plasma concentration, GMR geometric mean ratio, SD single dose, TDF tenofovir disoproxil fumarate