Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 10;11:1018. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01018

Table 1.

Comparison among clinical data of the GBS, CIDP, and Control groups, x ± s.

Subjects All patients Age (years) Sex HFGS
Male Female
GBS group 97 49.04 ± 16.19 51 46 3.71 ± 0.52
CIDP group 78 51.67 ± 13.31 57 21 3.85 ± 0.40
Control group 81 34.98 ± 12.22 30 51 0.10 ± 0.30
F/χ2 32.79 20.88 2,088.69
P 0.00** 0.00** 0.00**

Differences in sex were statistically significant between the GBS and CIDP groups (χ2 = 7.69, P < 0.01), while HFGS showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Age and HFGS in the GBS and CIDP groups were higher than those in the control group (**P < 0.01).