Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;216(6):314–322. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.21

Table 2.

Staff characteristics in the Crisis team Optimisation and RElapse prevention (CORE) crisis resolution team service improvement programme trial

Baseline Follow-up
Control teams
(n = 10)
Intervention teams
(n = 15)
Control teams
(n = 10)
Intervention teams
(n = 15)
Gender, n/N (%)
Men 69/175 (39) 79/266 (30) 70/166 (42) 85/252 (34)
Women 106/175 (61) 187/266 (70) 96/166 (58) 167/252 (66)
Age, years: mean (s.d.) 43 (10) 42 (10) 45 (10) 43 (10)
Ethnicity, n/N (%)
White 118/175 (67) 181/266 (68) 107/164 (65) 165/252 (65)
Asian 18/175 (10) 29/266 (11) 24/164 (15) 26/252 (10)
Black 28/175 (16) 45/266 (17) 25/164 (15) 50/252 (20)
Mixed or other 11/175 (7) 11/266 (4) 8/164 (5) 11/252 (4)
Professional group, n/N (%)
Nurse 100/175 (57) 127/266 (48) 81/165 (49) 112/252 (44)
Occupational therapist 3/175 (2) 5/266 (2) 3/165 (2) 8/252 (3)
Psychiatrist 12/175 (7) 19/266 (7) 16/165 (10) 20/252 (8)
Psychologist 4/175 (2) 7/266 (3) 4/165 (2) 6/252 (2)
Social worker 12/175 (7) 26/266 (10) 8/165 (5) 22/252 (9)
Support worker 30/175 (17) 49/266 (18) 37/165 (22) 55/252 (22)
Other 14/175 (8) 33/266 (12) 16/165 (10) 29/252 (12)
Length of time worked in current team, n/N (%)
<1 year 31/175 (18) 58/265 (22) 26/173 (15) 54/258 (21)
1 to <2 years 30/175 (17) 43/265 (16) 25/173 (14) 40/258 (16)
2 to <5 years 48/175 (27) 74/265 (28) 71/173 (41) 73/258 (28)
5 to <10 years 45/175 (26) 60/265 (23) 36/173 (21) 52/258 (20)
≥10 years 21/175 (12) 30/265 (11) 25/173 (14) 39/258 (15)