Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2015 Nov 12;195(4 Pt 1):1136–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.013

Table 2.

Relationship of intraoperative CTC levels to patient characteristics

Intraop CTC
% Increase p Value Mean Count p Value
Age (greater than 60 vs 60 yrs or less) 31 vs 0 0.12 1.4 vs 0.3 0.08
Ethnicity (white vs nonwhite) 21 vs 17 0.64 1.1 vs 1.0 0.82
Body mass index (greater than 30 vs 30 kg/m2 or less) 25 vs 15 1.00 1.3 vs 0.8 0.36
Prostate size (greater than 50 vs 50 cc or less) 17 vs 23 1.00 1.2 vs 1.0 0.77
Estimated blood loss (500 or greater vs less than 500 ml) 13 vs 24 1.00 0.8 vs 1.2 0.52
Operative time (greater than 5 vs 5 hrs or less) 12 vs 38 0.28 0.6 vs 1.9 0.06
Nerve sparing extent (bilat vs unilat or nonnerve sparing) 21 vs 17 1.00 1.0 vs 1.2 0.82
pT stage (pT3 or greater vs pT2) 11 vs 25 0.62 0.8 vs 1.2 0.52
Gleason score (greater than 7 vs 7 or less) 18 vs 21 1.00 0.8 vs 1.2 0.53
Prostate Ca vol (25% or greater vs less than 25% of gland) 17 vs 23 1.00 0.8 vs 1.3 0.37
Perineural invasion (yes vs no) 25 vs 11 0.62 1.1 vs 0.9 0.72
Detectable postop PSA (yes vs no) 29 vs 17 0.60 1.0 vs 1.1 0.94
Clinical stage (cT1c vs cT2) 25 vs 0 0.54 1.2 vs 0.6 0.48
Initial PSA detectable (yes vs no) 17 vs 21 1.00 1.0 vs 1.0 0.94
Postop progression (yes vs no) 0 vs 25 0.54 1.2 vs 1.0 0.80