Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;58(10):e01032-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01032-20

TABLE 5.

Costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness for different test strategiesa

Strategy and test Cost/1,000 patients screened
No. of patients diagnosed/1,000 screenedb Cost-effectiveness
Total Diagnostic Treatment Cost per patient diagnosedc Cost difference (compared to Xpert only)
Single
    Xpert 355,358 (353,256–359,086) 14,375 (14,375–14,375) 340,983 (338,881–344,711) 237.1 (214.9–256.7) 1,500 (1,399–1,645)
    LAM 305,927 (305,271–307,949) 3,557 (3,557–3,557) 302,370 (303,714–304,392) 121.3 (98.4,145.4) 2,525 (2,120–3,124) 1,025
Sequential
    LAM in Xpert-negative patients 400,656 (412,366–406,317) 15,049 (14,997–15,014) 385,608 (397,370–391,303) 247.9 (205.7–288.6) 1,617 (1,429–1,976) 117
    Xpert in LAM-negative patients 401,476 (405,139–414,150) 16,978 (16,954–16,991) 384,499 (388,185–397,160) 247.7 (219–278.1) 1,621 (1,458–1,892) 122
Concurrent (Xpert+LAM) 402,909 (400,992–406,859) 17,932 17,932–17,932) 384,977 (383,061–388,927) 247.9 (226.3–266.3) 1,626 (1,507–1,799) 127
a

Costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness for single, sequential, and concurrent test strategies to diagnose TB in hospitalized patients with advanced HIV using Xpert MTB/RIF and LAM urine tests. Costs are expressed in 2018 U.S. dollars, with 95% CIs in parentheses.

b

Number of culture-positive patients correctly diagnosed and started on treatment per 1,000 patients screened, with 95% CI in parentheses.

c

Cost per culture-positive patient diagnosed and started on treatment.