Table 1. Comparison of Analytical Performance of Fabricated HMCA/NF Sensing Electrode with Other Proposed Nonenzymatic Sensors.
| sensing materials | detection potential (V) | sensitivity (μA mM–1 cm–2) | LOD (μM) | linear range | response time (s) | references |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D electrospun CuO nanofibers/GCE | 0.4 | 431.3 | 0.8 | 6 μM to 2.5 mM | ∼1 | (36) |
| ZnO–CuO HNCs/FTO glass plate | 0.7 | 3066.4 | 0.21 | 0.47 μM to 1.6 mM | ∼2 | (37) |
| β-MnO2 micro/nanorod arrays/flexible carbon | ||||||
| fiber fabric | 0.55 | 1650.6 | 1.9 | 0.01 mM to 4.5 mM | <3 | (38) |
| CuO | ||||||
| nanoparticles/CNT | 0.4 | 2596 | 0.2 | 0.4 μM to 1.2 mM | <1 | (39) |
| Ni/MnO2 | ||||||
| nanocomposite/GCE | 0.45 | 1040 | 0.1 | 0.25 μM to 3.5 mM | <3 | (40) |
| CuO nanoparticles decorated carbon spheres | 0.55 | 2981 | 0.1 | 0.5 μM to 2.3 mM | <5 | (41) |
| Nafion/CuO nanoseeds/Au | 0.6 | 1101 | 50 | 0.1 mM to 13.3 mM | ∼2 | (42) |
| 3D porous CNT/MnO2 composite | 0.6 | 3406.4 | 0.5 | 5 μM to 1 mM | <3 | (43) |
| ZnO@N2-doped carbon sheets (NDC) | 0.75 | 231.7 | 6.3 | 0.2–12 mM | <3 | (44) |
| HMCA/NF | 0.3 | 2194 | 0.43 | 5 μM to 2.5 mM | <4 | present work |