Table 5.

Results of the performance metrics at the setting of the cut-point $c$ for highly weighting the sensitivity ($Se>99\%$) for the four entropy measures in the MIT-BIH AF database.

Task	Metric	SampEn	FuzzyMEn	COSEn	EntropyAF
AF vs. N rhythms	$c$	1.04	0.29	−1.88	0.54
	$J$(%)	15.71	24.42	63.64	87.05
	$Se$(%)	>99.0	>99.0	>99.0	>99.0
	$Sp$(%)	16.64	25.34	64.14	87.91
	$Acc$(%)	50.20	57.77	79.69	92.85
	$PPV$(%)	44.94	51.03	68.54	86.55
	$NPV$(%)	96.32	97.24	99.39	99.24
	$Err$(%)	49.80	42.23	20.31	7.15
AF vs. non-AF rhythms	$c$	1.04	0.29	−1.88	0.54
	$J$(%)	16.89	23.63	61.53	85.15
	$Se$(%)	>99.0	>99.0	>99.0	>99.0
	$Sp$(%)	17.82	24.55	62.03	86.01
	$Acc$(%)	49.75	56.30	77.99	91.60
	$PPV$(%)	43.83	49.36	66.04	84.02
	$NPV$(%)	96.74	97.30	99.41	99.26
	$Err$(%)	50.25	43.70	22.01	8.40