Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;124(3):256–272. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520000975

Table 3.

Regression estimates, standard errors, 95 % confidence intervals and coefficients of determination (R2) for the fitted relationship: Inline graphic, where Y was the body ash weight and X was the body protein weight under the following three ad libitum feeding schedules: (1) pigs were given protein-deficient feeds; (2) pigs were given nutritionally balanced feeds; (3) pigs were given phosphorus-deficient feeds*

(Regression estimates, standard errors, 95 % confidence intervals and coefficients of determination)

Parameter Feed class Estimate se 95 % CI P R2
ln(a) Protein-deficient −1·57 0·0477 −1·67, −1·48 0·983 (protein-deficient)
Balanced −1·63 0·0324 −1·70, −1·57
P-deficient −1·68 0·0563 −1·79, −1·57 0·972 (balanced)
b Protein-deficient 1·08 0·0289 1·02, 1·14 0·00880
Balanced 0·981 0·0150 0·951, 1·01 0·204 0·956 (P-deficient)
P-deficient 0·873 0·0261 0·821, 0·926 1·18 × 10–5
*

Probability values were given for the direct test of whether the estimated relationship was isometric (b = 1). A total of 211 individual data points representing mean values for each considered dietary treatment reported in twenty-five studies (see online Supplementary material for a list of included studies) were used in the analysis.