Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 10;5(37):23898–23908. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03158

Table 2. ANOVA Analysis for Response Surface Quadratic Model.

source sum of the squares df mean square F value P value  
modelNa-SGM 6904.92 9 767.21 211.75 <0.0001 significant
modelK-SGM 25373.76 9 2819.31 112.08 <0.0001 significant
A—pHNa-SGM 1371.57 1 1371.57 378.55 <0.0001  
A—pHK-SGM 13001.59 1 13001.59 516.86 <0.0001  
BC0,Na-SGM 628.88 1 628.88 173.57 <0.0001  
BC0,K-SGM 908.45 1 908.45 36.11 0.0005  
C—dosageNa-SGM 161.46 1 161.46 44.56 0.0003  
C—dosageK-SGM 1816.24 1 1816.24 72.20 <0.0001  
ABNa-SGM 393.23 1 393.23 108.53 <0.0001  
ABK-SGM 0.40 1 0.40 0.016 0.9036  
ACNa-SGM 2276.72 1 2276.72 628.37 <0.0001  
ACK-SGM 6555.33 1 6555.33 260.60 <0.0001  
BCNa-SGM 644.40 1 644.40 177.85 <0.0001  
BCK-SGM 101.71 1 101.71 4.04 0.0843  
A2Na-SGM 1188.03 1 1188.03 327.89 <0.0001  
A2K-SGM 135.72 1 135.72 5.40 0.0532  
B2Na-SGM 148.69 1 148.69 41.04 0.0004  
B2K-SGM 170.45 1 170.45 6.78 0.0353  
C2Na-SGM 16.09 1 16.09 4.44 0.0731  
C2K-SGM 2511.92 1 2511.92 99.86 <0.0001