Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;93(4):517–528.

Table 1. Sources collected and methodology.

Author (Year) Focus Sampling strategy and size Methodology
Armuand et al. (2017) Examine how transgender men experience fertility preservation in cryopreservation of oocytes. Prospective study of 15 adult transgender men (ages 19-35) referred for fertility preservation. Interviews were conducted between 62 and 111 minutes long. Thematic content analysis
Chen et al. (2018) Examine attitudes toward fertility and family formation in TGNC youth. Online survey of 156 sexual and gender minority adolescents ages 14-17 years Thematic analysis of qualitative data through open coding
Cipres et al. (2017) Studying the reproductive health needs of transgender men who may be able to conceive. Retrospective review of charts of 26 transgender men presenting to a clinic for sex workers Descriptive statistics
Ellis et al. (2015) Explore conception, pregnancy, and birth experiences of male- identifies and gender-variant natal females. 60 to 90 minute interviews and a self-administered online demographic survey of 8 male-identified or gender-variant gestational parents Grounded theory methodology
Hoffkling et al. (2017) Identifying the needs of transgender men during the family planning process and the peripartum period. Interviews with 10 transgender men ages 18 or older Grounded theory approach
James-Abra et al. (2015) Examining the experiences of trans persons who sought assisted reproduction in Ontario, Canada. 60-90 minute qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 trans-identified people and their partners Qualitative analysis using descriptive phenomenological approach
Leung et al. (2019) Investigate ART outcomes in female-to-male transgender cohort matched to a cisgender cohort. Matched retrospective study comparing 26 female-to-male transgender patients matched to 130 cisgender patients matched by age, body mass index and antimullerian hormone levels Matched cohort analysis and descriptive statistics
Light et al. (2014) Exploring the experiences of transgender men regarding fertility, conception, and pregnancy experience and birth outcomes. Cross-sectional survey of 41 transgender men who had been pregnant. Mixed-methods analysis
Light et al. (2018) To understand current contraceptive practices and fertility desires among transgender men during and after transitioning. 197 transgender and transmasculine individuals ages 18-45 completed an anonymous online survey Mixed-methods analysis
MacDonald et al. (2016) Establish knowledge about transmasculine individuals and their experiences of lactation and chestfeeding. Interviews with 22 transgender men who had experienced or were experiencing pregnancy, birth and infant feeding Interpretive description methodology
Mamo (2013) Examining how queer people engage with fertility biomedicine. Ethnographic data Synthesis of social science, media culture and the author’s empirical research
Malmquist et al. (2019) Explore the thoughts and experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and healthcare in self-identified lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. Semi-structured 61-180 minute interviews with 17 LBT people, 15 who had expressed fear of childbirth. Thematic analysis
Wierckx et al. (2012) Provide information about the reproductive wishes of transsexual men after ‘sex reassignment’ surgery. Used a self-constructed questionnaire and surveyed 50 transsexual men in a single-center study Statistical analysis.
Wingo et al. (2018) Researching the reproductive health priorities and experiences of LGBTQ identified individuals. In-depth interviews with 39 female-assigned-at- birth individuals ages 18-44 Deductive and inductive coding of interviews through a framework method