Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;21(1):37. doi: 10.3390/e21010037

Table 4.

Performance comparison with other state-of-art methods.

Models F-Score of Each DDI Type Overall
Advice Effect Mechanism Int Precision Recall F-Score
UTurku [12] 63.0 60.0 58.2 50.7 73.20 49.90 59.40
Feature-based FBK irst [49] 69.20 62.80 67.90 54.70 64.60 65.60 65.10
method Kim [14] 72.50 66.20 69.30 48.30 - - 67.00
Raihani [15] 77.40 69.60 73.60 52.40 73.70 68.70 71.10
CNN [20] 77.72 69.32 70.23 46.37 75.70 64.66 69.75
SCNN [21] - - - - 72.50 65.10 68.60
MCCNN [22] 78.00 68.20 72.20 51.00 75.99 65.25 70.21
Neural GRU [50] - - - - 73.67 70.79 72.20
network-based CNN-GCNs [23] 81.62 71.03 73.83 45.83 73.31 71.81 72.55
method SVM-LSTM [25] 71.50 72.00 73.80 54.90 75.30 63.70 69.00
Joint-LSTMs [26] 79.41 67.57 76.32 43.07 73.41 69.66 71.48
Hierarchical RNNs [27] 80.30 71.80 74.00 54.30 74.10 71.80 72.90
PM-BLSTM [28] 81.60 71.28 74.42 48.57 75.80 70.38 72.99
Our method RHCNN 80.54 73.49 78.25 58.90 77.30 73.75 75.48