Table 7.

Comparison of key space to other related works.

Key Space
Chaotic Map	Simple Precision $\mathit{np}=\mathbf{8}$	Double Precision $\mathit{np}=\mathbf{16}$	Multiple Precision (Proposed PRNG)
			$\mathit{np}=\mathbf{99}$	$\mathit{np}=\mathbf{999}$
Proposed Tinkerbell ($nprocess$) [73]	$2^{n\times 192}$	$2^{n\times 384}$	$2^{n\times 2041}$	$2^{n\times 19,979}$
Tinkerbell ($1-process$) [73]	$2^{192}$	$2^{384}$	$2^{2041}$	$2^{19,979}$
Related work
Rössler hyperchaotic [13]	N/A	$2^{744}$	N/A	N/A
Discrete [35]	N/A	$2^{428}$	N/A	N/A
Three chaotic maps [37]	N/A	$2^{400}$	N/A	N/A
5D Hyperchaotic [77]	N/A	${10}^{90}\simeq 2^{299}$	N/A	N/A
Chen [11]	N/A	$2^{256}$	N/A	N/A
Tent map [32]	N/A	$2^{255}$	N/A	N/A
Two chaotic maps [38]	N/A	$2^{213}$	N/A	N/A
Logistic 1D [59]	N/A	$2^{199}$	N/A	N/A
Novel 3D [4]	N/A	$2^{198}$	N/A	N/A
Tinkerbell [39]	N/A	$2^{183}$	N/A	N/A
Multi-modal [34]	N/A	$2^{159}$	N/A	N/A
PLM [33]	N/A	$2^{136}$	N/A	N/A
Logistic 1D [36]	N/A	$2^{128}$	N/A	N/A
Logistic 1D [25]	N/A	$2^{128}$	N/A	N/A