. 2019 Mar 23;21(3):318. doi: 10.3390/e21030318

Table 8.

Comparison of SSIM and FSIM value obtained by WOA-DE-Kapur, ABF-Otsu, and CSA-MCET.

Images	K	SSIM			FSIM
Images	K	WOA-DE-Kapur	ABF-Otsu	CSA-MCET	WOA-DE-Kapur	ABF-Otsu	CSA-MCET
Slice20	2	0.7923	0.7726	0.7882	0.8743	0.8565	0.8421
	3	0.8784	0.8061	0.8811	0.9411	0.9305	0.9594
	4	0.9225	0.8408	0.9208	0.9608	0.9614	0.9599
	5	0.9435	0.8862	0.9249	0.9882	0.9674	0.9723
Slice24	2	0.6809	0.7886	0.7865	0.7772	0.8178	0.8117
	3	0.8391	0.8318	0.8343	0.8686	0.8660	0.8394
	4	0.8791	0.8770	0.8742	0.9081	0.9026	0.8944
	5	0.9015	0.8959	0.8997	0.9277	0.9253	0.9099
Slice28	2	0.7832	0.7678	0.7792	0.813	0.8394	0.8274
	3	0.8365	0.8238	0.8275	0.8849	0.8846	0.8585
	4	0.8672	0.8687	0.8691	0.9084	0.9136	0.9156
	5	0.8993	0.8937	0.9010	0.9371	0.9355	0.9366
Slice32	2	0.8123	0.7973	0.7862	0.8617	0.8388	0.8589
	3	0.8465	0.832	0.8513	0.8864	0.8943	0.9009
	4	0.8794	0.8824	0.8784	0.9199	0.9271	0.9275
	5	0.9023	0.8705	0.8991	0.9477	0.9237	0.9347
Rank		1(10)	3(2)	2(4)	1(9)	3(3)	2(4)