Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;21(4):385. doi: 10.3390/e21040385

Table 9.

EEG classification results for different values of N and m. These results should be compared with those of Table 8, where the same dataset was used, but with all the 4097 samples.

m N Sensitivity Specificity p AUC
3 100 0.76 0.86 <0.0001 0.8604
3 200 0.83 0.83 <0.0001 0.8966
3 300 0.85 0.84 <0.0001 0.9183
3 400 0.86 0.86 <0.0001 0.9241
3 500 0.89 0.83 <0.0001 0.9336
3 1000 0.87 0.87 <0.0001 0.9362
4 100 0.75 0.85 <0.0001 0.8531
4 200 0.86 0.81 <0.0001 0.8898
4 300 0.86 0.80 <0.0001 0.9086
4 400 0.87 0.83 <0.0001 0.9167
4 500 0.83 0.88 <0.0001 0.9264
4 1000 0.86 0.87 <0.0001 0.9307
5 100 0.74 0.84 <0.0001 0.8441
5 200 0.82 0.82 <0.0001 0.8746
5 300 0.84 0.80 <0.0001 0.8963
5 400 0.85 0.83 <0.0001 0.8999
5 500 0.86 0.84 <0.0001 0.9132
5 1000 0.87 0.85 <0.0001 0.9260
6 100 0.73 0.83 <0.0001 0.8239
6 200 0.81 0.79 <0.0001 0.8513
6 300 0.82 0.79 <0.0001 0.8729
6 400 0.85 0.81 <0.0001 0.8800
6 500 0.86 0.81 <0.0001 0.8940
6 1000 0.89 0.81 <0.0001 0.9146
7 100 0.71 0.79 <0.0001 0.7991
7 200 0.78 0.79 <0.0001 0.8283
7 300 0.75 0.81 <0.0001 0.8461
7 400 0.87 0.82 <0.0001 0.8533
7 500 0.85 0.78 <0.0001 0.8700
7 1000 0.89 0.78 <0.0001 0.8942