. 2019 May 24;21(5):525. doi: 10.3390/e21050525

Table A2.

Difference in the results after removing networks and states with $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$ = 0‖1.

#	S.D. Measure	Δr	S.I. Measure	Δr
	Φ_3.0		$Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$
A	CO Φ_3.0	−0.004	CO $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$	−0.004
B	NN Φ_3.0	0.000	NN $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$	0.000
C	WS Φ_3.0	0.027	WS $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$	0.006
D	IC Φ_3.0	0.021	IC $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$	0.006
E			Est₅Φ_3.0	−0.080
F	Φ_2.0	−0.396	$Φ_{2.0}^{p e a k}$	−0.289
G	Φ_2.5	−0.491	$Φ_{2.5}^{p e a k}$	−0.266
H			D1	−0.124
I			D2	−0.172
J			S	−0.405
K			LZ	−0.106
L			Φ*	−0.118
M			SI	0.063
N			MI	0.010
O	AP Φ_3.0	−0.029	AP $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$	0.014

Abbreviations: Δr: change in correlation values with measures A–F using Pearson’s r, and G–O using Spearman’s r_s; SEst₅: $Φ_{3.0}^{p e a k}$ estimated from five sample states.