Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;21(6):570. doi: 10.3390/e21060570

Table 3.

Metric value comparisons of reference methods and proposed method on 12 benchmark image pairs.

EN MI SSIM QAB/F VIF
LP 6.7053 1.9353 0.4938 0.6011 0.4363
Wavelet 6.3003 2.4895 0.4869 0.2939 0.3028
NSCT 6.5850 1.8830 0.4945 0.5753 0.4213
DTMDCT 6.9425 1.8486 0.4431 0.3952 0.2956
CBF 6.5989 1.7220 0.4843 0.4752 0.3696
HMSD 6.9609 2.6005 0.4891 0.5284 0.3943
GFF 6.9890 3.5612 0.4344 0.6180 0.4681
ADF 6.3511 2.2094 0.4786 0.3823 0.3270
ASR 6.4384 2.0770 0.4898 0.5125 0.3767
LPSR 6.3580 2.0916 0.4856 0.3199 0.2910
OIPCNN 7.1803 4.9356 0.3906 0.6106 0.4069
N-S-P 6.9947 2.6022 0.4312 0.5015 0.4060
DDCTPCA 6.5567 1.8382 0.4851 0.5068 0.3927
FPDE 6.3974 1.9024 0.4617 0.4167 0.3338
TSIFVS 6.6270 1.8646 0.4898 0.5059 0.3632
LEPLC 7.0770 2.4172 0.4943 0.4810 0.4569
GTF 6.5819 2.1623 0.4236 0.3804 0.3440
IFEVIP 6.8685 3.8723 0.4865 0.4805 0.4061
Ours 7.1967 2.9402 0.6582 0.6181 0.4780