Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;21(6):570. doi: 10.3390/e21060570

Table 4.

CPU time comparisons of the proposed method and reference methods on benchmark sequences.

Method Nato_Camp Duine
LP 0.004 ± 0.0007 0.0044 ± 0.0002
Wavelet 0.155 ± 0.0382 0.1592 ± 0.0018
NSCT 1.439 ± 0.0092 1.4402 ± 0.0096
DTMDCT 0.035 ± 0.0018 0.0337 ± 0.0019
CBF 6.143 ± 0.0213 6.1211 ± 0.0304
HMSD 0.544 ± 0.0558 0.5492 ± 0.0328
GFF 0.087 ± 0.0067 0.0927 ± 0.0091
ADF 0.177 ± 0.0031 0.1730 ± 0.0075
ASR 94.638 ± 0.3782 94.6380 ± 0.3199
LPSR 0.011 ± 0.0026 0.0087 ± 0.0005
OIPCNN 0.400 ± 0.0021 0.3995 ± 0.0018
N-S-P 72.047 ± 0.2027 72.0280 ± 0.1884
DDCTPCA 36.901 ± 0.1771 37.1020 ± 0.1162
FPDE 0.092 ± 0.0040 0.0925 ± 0.0043
TSIFVS 0.010 ± 0.0019 0.0102 ± 0.0014
LEPLC 0.149 ± 0.0085 0.1575 ± 0.0056
GTF 0.992 ± 0.0609 1.3706 ± 0.1052
IFEVIP 0.052 ± 0.0012 0.0542 ± 0.0015
Proposed 19.773 ± 0.178 19.1633 ± 0.132