Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;1:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100046

Table 2.

Various techniques used for the detection of oral cancer.

Sr.
No.
Technique Principle/Mechanism Specimen Biomarker Sensitivity Advantages Disadvantages Cost (∼₹) Ref.
1. Autofluorescence spectroscopy Autofluorescence spectroscopy and imaging Oral tissue NA 91.1% Non-invasive
Patient compatible
Non-specific 400–1000 [17]
2. Brush biopsy Brushing and microscopic examination Oral cells Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor 77.0% Non-invasive
Relatively painless
Low cost
Requires minimum technical skills
Inadequate sampling
False negative results
500–1500 [18,19]
3. Computed tomography Ionizing radiation (X-ray)-based tissue imaging Soft tissue in head and neck region (in situ) NA NA Rapid and painless
Widely available
Decent visualization
The harm of radiation exposure
Lower resolution
Side effects of contrast medium
500–5000 [20]
4. Confocal microscopy Optical imaging Oral mucosal cells NA NA Control of depth of field
Collection of multiple optical sections
Elimination of background data
A limited number of excitation wavelength
Harmful high-intensity laser irradiation
Expensive
4000 [21]
5. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy Tissue reflectance optical spectroscopy Oral tissue Collagen, elastin, keratin, FAD, and NADH 98.5% Low cost
Rapid
Non-invasive
Quantitative
Good sensitivity and specificity
Real-time data
Complex
Encompasses several broad and overlapping bands
500–2000 [22]
6. DNA microarray Simultaneous measurement of multi-gene expression Oral tissue Genes i.e. CDH1, MMP3, SPARC, POSTN, TNC, TGM3, HMGA1, PABPC1, NT5E, FASN, FOS, P53, etc. NA High throughput technology
Relatively affordable
High sensitivity
Laborious method
Numerous printing devices are required
700–5000 [23,24]
7. Elastic scattering spectroscopy biopsy Wavelength dependant light scattering Oral tissue NA 87.0% Used in deciding the extent of surgical margins
No secondary procedures
Time-consuming
Limited angular resolution
[25]
8. Enzyme assay ELISA Saliva Proteases NA Less sample volume
Non-invasive
Laborious method
Lower accuracy
200–1000 [26]
9. Exfoliative biopsy Scraping and microscopic examination Oral epithelial cell linings Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 100% Patient Compliant
Low cost
Minimal skills required
Minimal instrumentation
Chances of contamination and false-negative results
Low sensitivity
Inadequate sampling
600–2600 [27,28]
10. Fine needle biopsy Microscopic examination Oral cells NA 75% Simple
Accurate
Low cost
Bleeding
Infection
Nerve Injury
Swelling
1000 [29,30]
11. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy Absorption based optical spectroscopy Sputum Glycogen, keratin NA High sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy
Non-invasive
Early detection
Potassium bromide reduces spectral quality 1800 [31]
12. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Column chromatography Serum Serum proteins 87.5% Automated procedure
Sample retrieval
Quantitative investigation
High sensitivity
Require special detectors
Expensive
4000–5000 [32]
13. Histopathological examination Microscopic examination Oral tissue p53, ki-67 NA Large segments of tissues are studied
Quick collection
Little or no risk
Time-consuming slide preparation
Chances of human error
Less specific
Difficulty to identify specific types of cells
800–6400 [33]
14. Immunohistochemistry Staining and microscopic examination Oral tissue Mutant p53 gene NA Widely used
Rapid
No availability of standardized stains
Difficult quantification
Chances of human error
1750–3500 [34]
15. Incisional biopsy Microscopic examination Oral tissue Cytokeratin-19 NA A small piece of tissue is required
Performed in suspected cases of malignancy and pre-malignancy
Detailed, specific, and accurate analysis
Increased risk of metastasis of malignant lesions
Avoided in vascular cases
1000–2000 [35]
16. Laser capture microdissection Cell extraction and molecular characterization Oral tissue Proteins (CK-14, CK-17) NA Accurate and quick cell separation
Preserves tissue morphology
Expensive
Sample contamination
High level of expertise required
6000 [36,37]
17. Laser-induced tissue auto-fluorescence Fluorometry Oral mucosa (in situ) NADH, elastin, collagen 100% High sensitivity
Low sample volume
Rapid
Suitable for in situ testing
Limited depth of penetration [38]
18. Liquid biopsy Molecular biotechnology procedures (e.g. PCR) Blood, saliva Circulating tumor cells/DNA, exosomes for blood and Cd63, salivary exosomal miRNAs 88.9% Rapid
Easy sampling
Less invasive
Comprehensive tissue profile
Allows more frequent and serial samplings over time
Allows molecular profiling of tissues
Need for an initial histological diagnosis
Chances of false-negative
An expert analyst is required
Expensive
8000-20,000 [39]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging Non-ionizing radio frequency electromagnetic radiation-based analysis Soft tissue in head and neck region (in situ) NA NA Non-invasive and no radiation
High-resolution images
Multidimensional imaging
Detects status of metastasis
Expensive
Probability of false-positive result
Patients with metal implants cannot undergo MRI
5000–17000 [40]
20. Mass spectroscopy The mass-to-charge ratio of ions is measured with respect to intensity Oral tissue Proteins and lipids NA Molecular profiling of tissues
Accurate
Expensive instrumentation 2000–6000 [41]
21. Micro total analysis system Microfluidics Saliva Nucleic acids NA Rapid
Convenient
Low cost
Portable
Low sample volume
Non-invasive
Automated operation
Complex fabrication method
Insufficient interfaces for fluid transfer
50–100 [42]
22. Multispectral digital microscope Fluorescence imaging Oral tissue NA 98% Highly sensitive
Informative
Slow
Complex sample preparation
500–2000 [43]
23. Optical coherence tomography White light Michelson interferometry Oral mucosa NA 90% High-resolution images
Fast acquisition time
Non-invasive
Easy-to-use
Limited depth of penetration (1.5–2 mm)
Light interference reduces sensitivity
Negative influence on image quality due to hyperkeratosis.
1000–2500 [44,45]
24. Physical examination Systematic visual examination and palpation Oral cavity (in situ) NA NA Reduces morbidity, mortality, incidence of invasive cancers
Identifies high-risk groups
Low cost
Detection in a late phase
Requires skilled professional
Chances of false positive and negative
200–500 [46]
25. Polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification Serum and saliva HPV DNA, tetranectin NA Quantitative
Greater sensitivity
Reproducibility
Better control of quality in the process
Lower risk of contamination
Expert analyst required
Analysis depends on many complex, interrelated factors
Expensive
3000–4000 [47]
26. Positron emission tomography Imaging using radioactive agents Head and neck region (in situ) NA NA Measure cellular-level metabolic changes
Early detection
Non-invasive
Less accurate sometimes
Short decay-duration of a radioactive substance
Expensive
2000–27000 [48]
27. Raman spectroscopy Optical spectroscopic technique for chemical analysis Oral tissue Keratin 95% Minimal sample preparation
Highly informative
Non-destructive
Non-invasive
Signal inadequacy
Bands overlap, difficulty in identifying individual component
1000 [49,50]
28. Spectral cytopathology Micro-spectral measurement and multivariate data analysis Oral cells Proteins NA Accurate and reproducible
Less human error
Expensive [51]
29. Ultrasound (Sonography) High-frequency sound wave-based imaging Head and neck region (in situ) NA NA Non-invasive
Non-ionizing radiation
Operator dependent analysis
Cannot image cyst duct
600-20,000 [52]
30. VELscope Fluorometry Oral tissue (in situ) NA 74.1% Assist in biopsy site selection
Low cost
Non-invasive
Easy and rapid
Convenient
Early diagnosis of lesions
No recording
Provide false positive and false negative
No definitive diagnosis
Low sensitivity
Inadequate sampling
1000–2000 [53]
31. Vital staining techniques Visual tissue staining (e.g. toluidine blue) and microscopic examination Oral tissue Sulfate,
DNA, RNA
97.8% Simple
Low cost
Non-invasive
Easy-to-do
Widely available
High percentage of false-positive cases 20–200 [54]
32. ViziLite Tissue reflectance-based examination Oral soft tissue (in situ) NA 77.3% Non-invasive
Easy and rapid
Convenient
Early detection
Low cost
No recording
Low specificity for dysplasia
Non-specific
1000 [55]
33. X-ray Radiation-based imaging Head and neck region (in situ) NA NA Easy
Rapid
Non-invasive
Unsafe for pregnant women
No precise and detailed information for each tooth or soft tissues
250–2000 [56]