Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2020 Sep 24;7:70. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00278-y

Table 5.

Robotic TKA versus Conventional TKA Survivorship

					Survivorship
Author	Year	Navigation	Implants	Follow-up	RATKA	CON TKA
Kim [54]	2020	ROBODOC	PS Duracon	15 years	100% (n = 724) 84	100% (n = 724) 74
Jeon [55]	2019	ROBODOC	NextGen (Robotic)	10 years	98.8% (n = 84)	97.5% (n = 79)
Jeon [55]	2019	ROBODOC	Triathalon (conventional)	10 years	98.8% (n = 84)	97.5% (n = 79)
Cho [56]	2019	ROBODOC	NextGen	13.5 years	98.8% (n = 160)	98.5% (n = 230)
Yang [53]	2017	ROBODOC	NextGen	10 years	97.1% (n = 71)	92.3% (n = 42)

RATKA Robotic-Assisted TKA, CON Conventional TKA