Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;54(10):771–782. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa016

Table 4.

Moderation Results of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes

Pain rating b SE 95% CI [low, high] Sample within the J–N significance region (%)
Moderator: Race IAT
Interference 1.26 0.85 [−0.40, 2.92]
Distress 2.45 0.79 [0.89, 4.00] 80.0%
Opioids 1.17 0.87 [−0.53, 2.88]
Opioid Contracts −1.09 0.95 [−2.95, 0.78]
Workplace Accommodations 2.85 1.05 [0.79, 4.91] 68.8%
Moderator: SES IAT
Interference −1.14 1.24 [−3.58, 1.29]
Distress −1.56 0.95 [−3.43, 0.32]
Opioids −1.54 1.09 [−3.68, 0.60]
Opioid Contracts −0.42 1.21 [−2.79, 1.95]
Workplace Accommodations −1.02 1.69 [−4.35, 2.30]
Moderator: Race FT
Interference 0.01 0.02 [−0.03, 0.06]
Distress 0.03 0.02 [−0.01, 0.07]
Opioids 0.05 0.02 [0.01, 0.10] 80.0%
Opioid Contracts −0.04 0.02 [−0.09, 0.01]
Workplace Accommodations 0.03 0.03 [−0.02, 0.08]
Moderator: SES FT
Interference −0.02 0.02 [−0.07, 0.02]
Distress 0.00 0.02 [−0.04, 0.03]
Opioids 0.00 0.02 [−0.04, 0.04]
Opioid Contracts −0.05 0.02 [−0.10, −0.01] 78.9%
Workplace Accommodations 0.06 0.03 [0.00, 0.12] 98.8%

CI Confidence interval; JN, Johnson–Neyman; IAT Implicit association test; SE Standard error; SES Socioeconomic status.