Table 2.
Percent determinism (%DET) and percent recurrence (%REC) in fresh vs. fatigued muscles by RQA.
| Authors. | Muscle | m | τ (ms) | r | %DET | %REC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del Santo et al., 2007 [118] | D BB Q |
15 | 3 | 10% | 62 vs. 72 75 vs. 87 19 vs. 32 |
NA |
| Farina et al., 2002 [116] | BB | 15 | 3–6 | 10% (a) | 28 vs. 70 | 3.1 vs. 3.5 |
| Felici et al., 2001a [126] | VL | 15 | τ0 | 2% | 27 vs. 42 | NA |
| Felici et al., 2001b [122] | BB | 15 | τ0 | 2% | 33 vs. 78 | NA |
| Fattorini et al., 2005 [115] | FD | 15 | τ0 | 2% | 40 vs. 65 | NA |
| Filligoi et al., 1999 [113] | BB | 15 | τ0 | 2% | 36 vs. 60 | 4 |
| Ikegawa et al., 2000 [123] | MF | 10 | τ0 | 2% | 11 vs. 25 | 3.6 vs. 4 |
| Ito et al., 2012 [127] | BB | - | - | 10% | +15% | NA |
| Mesin et al., 2009 [78] | VL | 7 | 1 | 20% | NA | |
| Schmied et al., 2011 [119] | EC | 10 | 3 | 20% | 43 vs. 50 | |
| Uzun et al., 2012 [125] | BB, BR | 6 | 4 | - | 20 vs. 60 | |
| Webber et al., 1994 [111] | BB | 10 | τ0 | 2% | 20 vs. 30 | |
| Webber et al., 1995 [114] | BB | 10 | τ0 | 2% | 20 vs. 40 | |
| Webber et al., 2007 [112] | BB | 10 | 4 | 15% | 61 vs. na | |
| Yanli et al, 2005 [101] | BM | 7 | 3 | - | 82 vs. na | |
| Yang et al., 2005 [124] | BB | 10 | 4 | 15% | 55 vs. 90 |
m = embedding dimension; τ = delay; τ0 = first zero of the autocorrelation function (typically between 3–5 ms); r = radius as % of maximum distance or (a) of mean distance; BB = biceps brachii; BM = back muscles; BR = brachioradialis; D = deltoid; EC = extensor carpi radialis; FD = first dorsal interosseous; MF = multifidus; Q = quadriceps; VL = vastus lateralis.