Table 3.
Difference between areas | Standard Error | Z statistic | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MIBG vs. DaT-SPECT | 0.028 | 0.046 | 0.613 | 0.540 |
MIBG vs. OSIT-J | 0.237 | 0.072 | 3.294 | 0.001 |
MIBG vs. the pareidolia test | 0.228 | 0.081 | 2.832 | 0.005 |
MIBG vs. OSIT-J*Pareidolia test | 0.214 | 0.070 | 3.073 | 0.002 |
DaT-SPECT vs. OSIT-J | 0.208 | 0.083 | 2.520 | 0.011 |
DaT-SPECT vs. the pareidolia test | 0.200 | 0.087 | 2.304 | 0.021 |
DaT-SPECT vs. OSIT-J*Pareidolia test | 0.186 | 0.083 | 2.247 | 0.024 |
OSIT-J vs. the pareidolia test | 0.008 | 0.109 | 0.078 | 0.938 |
OSIT-J vs. OSIT-J*Pareidolia test | 0.023 | 0.013 | 1.703 | 0.089 |
the pareidolia test vs. OSIT-J*Pareidolia test | 0.014 | 0.101 | 0.140 | 0.089 |
PPV, Positive Predictive Value; NPV, Negative Predictive Value; AUC, Area under the curve.