Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Indic Res. 2018 Sep 1;143(2):765–794. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-1991-3

Table 11.

Estimates from diagonal mobility models predicting male depression

China Japan South Korea
Objective and subjective social class weight
 Objective social status weight (p) 0.210** (0.0865) 0.137 (0.531) 0.235 (0.184)
 Subjective social status weight (r) 0.790*** (0.0865) 0.863 (0.531) 0.765*** (0.184)
Social status
 Lower status 0.745*** (0.0886) 0.215* (0.110) 0.479*** (0.142)
 Middle status −0.138** (0.0682) 0.0971 (0.132) −0.311*** (0.109)
 Upper status −0.607*** (0.103) −0.312** (0.123) −0.169 (0.132)
Age 0.0557** (0.0215) −0.00869 (0.0254) −0.00143 (0.0346)
Age square −0.000440** (0.000197) 5.82e-07 (0.000225) 1.51e-05 (0.000314)
Female 0.487*** (0.0765) 0.168 (0.0982) 0.663*** (0.131)
Have health insurance −0.168 (0.127) −0.566* (0.276) −0.702** (0.276)
Marital status (Ref = Married or cohabiting)
 Widowed, separated or divorced 0.434*** (0.125) 0.0113 (0.152) 0.112 (0.194)
 Never married 0.0285 (0.255) 0.257 (0.163) 0.262 (0.234)
Community type (Ref = A big city)
 Suburbs or outskirts of a big city −0.0514 (0.181) −0.417* (0.240) 0.0802 (0.167)
 A town or a small city 0.158 (0.112) −0.326 (0.220) −0.109 (0.167)
 Country 0.231 (0.138) −0.380 (0.224) 0.376* (0.207)
***

p < 0.01,

**

p < 0.05,

*

p < 0.1