Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Indic Res. 2018 Sep 1;143(2):765–794. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-1991-3

Table 4.

Estimates from diagonal mobility models predicting depression

China Japan South Korea
Objective and subjective social class weight
 Objective social status weight (p) 0.223** (0.0880) 0.133 (0.487) 0.249 (0.213)
 Subjective social status weight (r) 0.777*** (0.0880) 0.867* (0.487) 0.751*** (0.213)
Consistent social status (OSS = SSS)
 Lower status 0.781*** (0.0945) 0.211 (0.124) 0.556*** (0.190)
 Lower-middle status 0.0155 (0.0930) 0.0147 (0.147) −0.0626 (0.178)
 Upper-middle status −0.197** (0.0849) 0.106 (0.129) −0.377*** (0.139)
 Upper status −0.599*** (0.121) −0.331** (0.149) −0.117 (0.149)
Age 0.0549** (0.0216) −0.00855 (0.0254) 0.00258 (0.0348)
Age square −0.000435** (0.000197) −1.25e-06 (0.000226) −2.29e-05 (0.000314)
Female (1 = yes) 0.484*** (0.0765) 0.166 (0.0987) 0.665*** (0.132)
Have health insurance −0.162 (0.127) −0.564* (0.277) −0.697** (0.278)
Marital status (Ref = Married or cohabiting)
 Widowed, separated or divorced 0.435*** (0.125) 0.0114 (0.152) 0.110 (0.194)
 Never married 0.0289 (0.256) 0.257 (0.163) 0.276 (0.235)
Community type (Ref = A big city)
 Suburbs or outskirts of a big city −0.0612 (0.182) −0.419* (0.240) 0.0799 (0.167)
 A town or a small city 0.149 (0.113) −0.325 (0.219) −0.110 (0.168)
 Country 0.214 (0.139) −0.381 (0.224) 0.369* (0.209)
***

p < 0.01,

**

p < 0.05,

*

p < 0.1