Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Indic Res. 2018 Sep 1;143(2):765–794. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-1991-3

Table 8.

Estimates from diagonal mobility models predicting male depression

China Japan South Korea
Objective and subjective social class weight
 Objective social status weight (p) 0.183 (0.149) 0.213 (0.338) 0.138 (0.256)
 Subjective social status weight (r) 0.817*** (0.149) 0.787** (0.338) 0.862*** (0.256)
Social status
 Lower status 0.741*** (0.135) 0.0105 (2.274) 0.717** (0.290)
 Lower-middle status −0.0810 (0.137) 0.459 (3.280) −0.0736 (0.195)
 Upper-middle status −0.123 (0.122) −0.278 (4.574) −0.736** (0.305)
 Upper status −0.537** (0.206) −0.191 (3.324) 0.0928 (0.290)
Age 0.0353 (0.0303) −0.0371 (0.0377) −0.0459 (0.0542)
Age square −0.000216 (0.000275) 0.000245 (0.000331) 0.000391 (0.000492)
Have health insurance −0.00600 (0.188) −0.164 (0.502) −0.938** (0.429)
Marital status (Ref = Married or cohabiting)
 Widowed, separated or divorced 0.548*** (0.194) 0.0984 (0.273) 0.945*** (0.315)
 Never married 0.176 (0.305) 0.238 (0.222) 0.313 (0.303)
Community type (Ref = A big city)
 Suburbs or outskirts of a big city 0.378 (0.263) −0.235 (0.376) 0.0111 (0.274)
 A town or a small city 0.312* (0.170) −0.316 (0.351) −0.0939 (0.268)
 Country 0.369* (0.204) −0.103 (0.353) 0.182 (0.330)
 N 1595 1048 588
***

p < 0.01,

**

p < 0.05,

*

p < 0.1