Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 7;34(5):2158–2168. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15883

TABLE 7.

Concordance between broth microdilution susceptibility and WGS of 48 Mannheimia haemolytica isolates

Genotype (+ or −)/broth microdilution susceptibility (S, I, or R)b No. isolates (%) Error type a
Antimicrobial Occasion −/S +/S −/I +/I −/R +/R P‐value Concordant Discordant Very major Major Minor
FLOR Arrival 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 (100%) 0 0 0 0
Revacc 7 0 6 0 1 8 .03 15 (68.2%) 7 (31.8%) 1 (4.5%) 0 6 (27.3%)
CEF Arrival 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 (100%) 0 0 0 0
Revacc 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 (100%) 0 0 0 0
PEN Arrival 11 0 13 0 2 0 0 11 (42.3%) 15 (57.7%) 2 (7.7%) 0 13 (50%)
Revacc 0 0 0 3 0 19 .2 19 (86.4%) 3 (13.6%) 0 0 3 (13.6%)
OXY Arrival 25 0 0 0 0 1 1 26 (100%) 0 0 0 0
Revacc 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 22 (100%) 0 0 0 0
ENR Arrival 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 (100%) 0 0 0 0
Revacc 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 22 (100%) 0 0 0 0
DANO Arrival 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 (100%) 0 0 0 0
Revacc 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 22 (100%) 0 0 0 0
TIL Arrival 22 0 3 0 1 0 .5 22 (84.6%) 4 (15.4%) 1 (3.8%) 0 3 (11.5%)
Revacc 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 22 (100%) 0 0 0 0
TUL Arrival 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 (100%) 0 0 0 0
Revacc 0 0 0 1 0 21 1 21 (95.5%) 1 (4.5%) 0 0 1 (4.5%)

Notes: Concordance for arrival isolates assessed out of 26 isolates, concordance for revaccination isolates assessed out of 22 isolates. Susceptibility interpretation indicated as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R).

Abbreviations: CEF, ceftiofur; ENR, enrofloxacin; FLOR, florfenicol; GAM, gamithromycin; TIL, tilmicosin; TUL, tulathromycin.

a

Very major = negative for resistance gene but classified as resistant by broth microdilution; Major = positive for resistance gene but classified as susceptible by broth microdilution; Minor = classified as intermediate by broth microdilution.

b

Phenotype (S or R or I)/genotype (−) = Any susceptibility phenotype and negative for all macrolide resistance genes or phenotype (S or R or I)/genotype (+) = Any susceptibility phenotype and positive for any one macrolide resistance gene.