Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;7(2):47–53. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.2017.0702.001

Table 2. Adherence to evidence-base endotracheal intubation practice patterns by intensivists and emergency department physicians.

Data are shown as number of patients with corresponding percentage, or mean ± SD. Abbreviations: See Table 1.

 

IC

ED

p value

Patients per group (n)

94

107

 

Use of video laryngoscopy (n/%)

63 (67%)

52 (49%)

0.008

Use of waveform capnography (n/%)

93 (99%)

92 (86%)

0.001

Endotracheal tube diameter > 8 mm (n/%)

89 (95%)

64 (60%)

< 0.001

Use of paralytic agent (n/%)

11 (12%)

54 (51%)

< 0.001

Use of succinylcholine (n/%)

5 (5%)

48 (45%)

< 0.001

Attempts (n)

1.27 ± 0.63

1.42 ± 0.67

0.095

Success with 1st attempt (n/%)

77 (82%)

72 (67%)

0.018

Use of sedation (n/%)

78 (83%)

84 (79%)

0.424

Number of sedative agents (n/%)

1.4 ± 0.9

1 ± 0.7

0.002

Propofol use (n/%)

56 (60%)

24 (22%)

< 0.001

Propofol dose (mg)

57 ± 35

81 ± 61

0.095

Etomidate use (n/%)

38 (40%)

35 (33%)

0.256

 

Etomidate dose (mg)

20 ± 0

21 ± 6

0.330

Midazolam use (n/%)

14 (15%)

44 (41%)

< 0.001

Midazolam dose (mg)

2.8 ± 2.4

4.4 ± 2.8

0.098

Fentanyl use (n/%)

19 (20%)

1 (1%)

< 0.001

Fentanyl dose (mcg)

86 ± 23

50 ± 0

0.146

 

Esophageal intubation (n/%)

7 (7%)

9 (8%)

0.801

Cardiac arrest (n/%)

1 (1%)

7 (7%)

0.047

Post-intubation hypotension (n/%)

7 (7%)

11 (10%)

0.483