Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct 8;155(2):177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.011

Table 2.

Univariate Analysis for Factors Associated With Cause-Specific Death, Disease Progression, and Lymphatic Progression Within 5 Years

Characteristic Cause-Specific Deatha
Disease Progressiona
Lymphatic Progressiona
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age, yb 1.42 (0.95–2.12) .08 1.26 (0.93–1.71) .13 NA
BMI, kg/m2,b 0.84 (0.62–1.13) .24 0.98 (0.80–1.21) .87 NA
Histologic type .14 .11 .02
   Endometrioid (n=66) Ref Ref Ref
   Nonendometrioid (n=38) 1.96 (0.81–4.76) 1.75 (0.89–3.44) 3.16 (1.24–8.09)
FIGO grade .005 .006 .008
   1 or 2 (n=54) Ref Ref Ref
   3 (n=50) 4.93 (1.63–14.90) 2.79 (1.35–5.78) 4.04 (1.43–11.36)
Myometrial invasion .15 .60 .30
   None (n=9) Ref Ref Ref
   <50% (n=37) 0.24 (0.05–1.09) 0.59 (0.20–1.74) 0.58 (0.17–1.95)
   ≥50% (n=58) 0.74 (0.24–2.28) 0.79 (0.29–2.16) 0.37 (0.11–1.31)
High riskc .003 .006 .005
   No (n=56) Ref Ref Ref
   Yes (n=48) 5.38 (1.78–16.22) 2.69 (1.32–5.47) 4.38 (1.56–12.29)
Cervical stroma invasion .04 .50 NA
   No (n=90) Ref Ref
   Yes (n=14) 3.42 (1.06–10.97) 1.45 (0.50–4.21)
Peritoneal cytologic findings .02 .27 NA
   Negative or not sampled (n=71) Ref Ref
   Positive (n=33) 3.01 (1.24–7.30) 1.48 (0.74–2.96)
No. of pelvic nodes removed .86 .66 .65
   0–12 (n=36) Ref Ref Ref
   13–30 (n=33) 1.31 (0.35–4.87) 1.30 (0.51–3.30) 0.95 (0.29–3.05)
   ≥31 (n=35) 1.52 (0.35–6.61) 1.70 (0.54–5.42) 1.82 (0.38–8.65)
Positive pelvic nodes .65 .16 .21
   No, or pelvic LND not done (n=15) Ref Ref Ref
   Yes (n=89) 1.34 (0.38–4.73) 2.38 (0.71–7.96) 3.70 (0.48–28.37)
Para-aortic LND .72 .90 .33
   No (n=29) Ref Ref Ref
   Yes (n=75) 1.32 (0.29–5.94) 0.94 (0.35–2.51) 0.54 (0.16–1.86)
No. of para-aortic nodes removed .98 .68 .21
   0–1 (n=34) Ref Ref Ref
   2–11 (n=34) 1.15 (0.30–4.49) 0.68 (0.27–1.73) 0.60 (0.19–1.85)
   ≥12 (n=36) 1.17 (0.22–6.24) 0.63 (0.19–2.11) 0.23 (0.05–1.19)
Positive para-aortic nodes .38 .09 .52
   No, or para-aortic LND not done (n=65) Ref Ref Ref
   Yes (n=39) 0.66 (0.26–1.68) 0.53 (0.25–1.11) 0.73 (0.27–1.92)
Adjuvant therapy .07 .02 .04
   Chemotherapy (n=29) 2.54 (0.85–7.65) 2.77 (1.20–6.37) 3.04 (0.99–9.38)
   Chemotherapy and EBRT (n=50) Ref Ref Ref
   EBRT (n=8) 1.61 (0.31–8.38) 4.50 (1.54–13.16) 7.81 (1.81–33.63)
   None or unknown (n=17) 4.98 (1.45–17.05) 2.93 (0.98–8.75) 2.59 (0.49–13.79)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; EBRT, external-beam radiotherapy; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HR, hazard ratio; LND, lymphadenectomy; NA, not analyzed; Ref, reference.

a

Each factor was evaluated in a separate univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, stratified by cohort (LND vs sentinel lymph node).

b

HR per 10-year increase in age and per 5-unit increase in BMI.

c

High risk defined as grade 3 endometrioid type with myometrial invasion ≥50% or nonendometrioid type.