Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 25;33(7):1853–1864. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01715-9

Table 3.

iTUG parameters measured with the inertial sensor

HC-YO HC-OO CI-YO CI-OO
iTUG duration (s) 11.1 ± 1.7 12.3 ± 2.0 15.0 ± 2.9a 21.7 ± 8.5a,b,c
Sit-to-stand time (s) 1.5 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 1.1a,b 2.2 ± 0.9a,b
Intermediate 180° turn time (s) 2.2 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.7 2.7 ± 0.6 3.9 ± 1.4a,b
Final 180° turn time (s) 1.7 ± 0.5 2.0 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 1.3a,b,c
Stand-to-sit time (s) 0.9 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.6a,b 1.4 ± 0.6a,b

Values are expressed as mean ± SD

HC healthy controls, CI cognitively impaired, YO young–old, OO old–old, iTUG instrumented Timed Up and Go

aSignificant difference vs. HC-YO after Bonferroni correction

bSignificant difference vs. HC-OO after Bonferroni correction

cSignificant difference vs. CI-YO after Bonferroni correction;