Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Funct Mater. 2019 Jan 23;29(10):1807736. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807736

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

High tumor selectivity of pCluster. A) Schematic depiction for tumor targeting of pCluster. B) Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) images of HCT116 and Hep3B cells after a 6 h incubation with pCluster (20 μg mL−1) at pH 7.4 or pH 6.5, all images were taken under the same exciting light and detector gain (scale bar: 60 μm). C) Cellular uptake of pCluster responded to acidic pH by flow cytometry analysis. D) Ex vivo fluorescent images of tumors and major organs from pParticle- and pCluster-treated mice at 12 h postinjection. He, heart; Li, liver; Sp, spleen; Lu, lung; Ki, kidneys; Tu, tumor; Br, Brain. E) Tumor-to-background (normal organ or tissue) ratios for pParticle and pCluster at 12 h postinjection. pCluster showed much better tumor selectivity than pParticle (n = 3, mean ± s.d.). F) Ex vivo fluorescent images of tumors and major organs from pCluster treated mice at 2 and 6 h postinjection. G) Tumor-to-background (normal organ or tissue) ratios for pCluster at 2 and 6 h postinjection. The latter showed significantly better tumor selectivity than the former (n = 3, mean ± s.d.). p values were calculated by t-test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).