Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Graph Stat. 2019 Jul 19;29(1):87–96. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2019.1629943

Table 1.

Proportion of dendrogram recovered by carp, carp–viz, and standard fixed-grid methods. The back-tracking employed by carp–viz is necessary for exact dendrogram recovery, but fixed step-size carp is still able to recover the dendrogram more accurately than standard fixed-grid approaches.

Method TCGA (n = 438, p = 353) Authors (n = 841, p = 69)
carp (t = 1.1) 5.93% 4.40%
carp (t = 1.05) 11.18% 8.09%
carp (t = 1.01) 41.55% 22.71%
carp (t = 1.005) 60.27% 30.56%
carp–viz 100% 100%
100-Point Grid 11.42% 5.00%
1000-Point Grid 37.44%