Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychol. 2020 Apr 23;153:107888. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107888

Table 1.

Kendall’s Tau Correlations.

M (SD) 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Family Conflict 2.70 (.82)
2. PEP Reactivity −14.47 (11.23) −.03
3. RSA Reactivity −.11 (.78) −.13* .17**
4. Direct Reactive .67 (.34) .19** −.08 .02
5. Direct Proactive .12 (.16) .05 −.04 .004 .42**
6. Indirect Reactive .52 (.61) .07 −.04 .02 .36** .36**
7. Indirect Proactive .35 (.42) −.02 −.03 .08 .27** .32** .44**

Note: Negative RSA and PEP reactivity values = more reactivity so the negative correlation between PEP reactivity and reactive aggression is interpreted such that more PEP reactivity is associated with more aggression.

**

p < .01.

*

p < .05.