Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 30;75(10):1811–1819. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz225

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Forest plots for selected associations with strong effect of the antagonistic genetic heterogeneity. Black and gray (blue on-line) show associations from the unconditional and conditional models, respectively, for minor alleles of: (A) rs780094 (GCKR locus) with HDL-C; conditioning is on TG, (B) rs17145738 (MLXIPL locus) with TC; conditioning is on LDL-C, (C) rs289715 (CETP locus) with LDL-C; conditioning is on TC, and (D) rs780094 (GCKR locus) with LDL-C; conditioning is on TC. Figures (A)–(C) illustrate three modes of strengthening the associations by dissecting the antagonistic genetic heterogeneity, ie, (A) increasing magnitude of the effect size, (B) decreasing the standard error, and (C) both. Figure (D) illustrates changes in the effect directions in opposite fashion in conditional and unconditional models. Bars show standard errors (SE). Cohorts: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC); Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA); Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS); Framingham Heart Study (FHS) original cohort (FHS_C1); FHS offspring (FHS_C2); FHS 3rd generation cohort (FHS_C3), Health and Retirement Study (HRS); the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), and Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). HDL-C = High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C = Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC = Total cholesterol; TG = Triglycerides.