Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;75(10):1928–1934. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa084

Table 2.

Optimal FI Change Values for Predicting One-Level Change in CFS

Baseline to Admission N with no CFS Change N with +1 CFS Change AUC Predicting +1 CFS Change (95% CI) Change in FI with Highest J J (Sensitivity, Specificity)
All 1,534 3,035 0.76 (0.74–0.77) 0.026 0.40 (0.70, 0.69)
Males 700 1,417 0.75 (0.73–0.77) 0.026 0.40 (0.69, 0.71)
Females 834 1,618 0.76 (0.75–0.78) 0.029 0.40 (0.65, 0.76)
Admission to Postdischarge N with no CFS Change N with -1 CFS Change AUC Predicting -1 CFS Change (95% CI) Change in FI with Highest J J (Sensitivity, Specificity)
All 1,565 1,819 0.68 (0.66–0.70) −0.032 0.27 (0.66, 0.61)
Males 716 855 0.67 (0.64–0.69) −0.025 0.25 (0.75, 0.50)
Females 849 964 0.69 (0.66–0.71) −0.031 0.30 (0.69, 0.61)

Note: Only patients who maintained or changed CFS by 1 level were included in this analysis. AUC = area under the ROC curve; CFS = Clinical Frailty Scale; CI = confidence interval; FI = Frailty Index; J = Youden Index value for the change in FI that best predicts a one-level change in CFS.