Table 4. Duration of labor compared with Zhang [26] and Oladapo[23] results.
Cervical dilation | Cervical dilation | Current study | Zhang et al | Oladapo et al |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 4 | 0.83 (0.14–4.97) | 1.8 (8.1) | 2.82 (0.60–13.33) |
4 | 5 | 0.89 (0.15–5.26) | 1.3 (6.4) | 1.72 (0.38–7.83) |
5 | 6 | 0.68 (0.10–4.55) | 0.8 (3.2) | 1.19 (0.23–6.17) |
6 | 7 | 0.48 (0.06–3.82) | 0.6 (2.2) | 0.66 (0.09–4.92) |
7 | 8 | 0.33 (0.03–3.62) | 0.5 (1.6) | 0.25 (0.02–3.10) |
8 | 9 | 0.24 (0.02–3.00) | 0.5 (1.4) | |
8 | 10 | 0.87 (0.18–4.19) | ||
9 | 10 | 0.18 (0.01–2.66) | 0.5 (1.8) |
Data are reported as median hours (5th, 95th percentiles)
Zhang et al data reported as median hours (95th percentile)