Country | Area of trait (‘000 ha) | Yield assumption % change | Base yield (tonnes/ha) | Farm level price ($/tonne) | Cost of technology ($/ha) | Impact on costs, net of cost of technology ($/ha) | Change in farm income ($/ha) | Change in farm income at national level (‘000 $) | Production impact (‘000 tonnes) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
US glyphosate tolerant | 397 | +4.28 | 1.98 | 348 | +17.3 | −7.78 | +37.29 | +14,810 | +42 |
US glufosinate tolerant | 381 | +5.9 | 1.98 | 348 | +17.3 | +12.88 | +27.81 | +10,611 | +30 |
Canada glyphosate tolerant | 3,511 | +4.28 | 2.09 | 383 | +28.55 | −3.06 | +28.82 | +101,208 | +213 |
Canada glufosinate tolerant | 5,262 | +5.9 | 2.09 | 383 | Nil | −13.47 | +89.62 | +471,581 | +1,045 |
Australia glyphosate tolerant | 499 | +8 | 1.14 | 407 | +9.72 | +0.98 | +27.14 | +13,538 | +45 |
Baseline (conventional) comparison in Canada with herbicide tolerant (non-GM) ‘Clearfield’ varieties.