Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 26;1226:129336. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129336

Table 3.

Comparison of the activity of agar-entrapped IL with those of other reported catalysts in the synthesis of 5-amino-7-(4-chlorophenyl)-7,8-dihydro[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidine (10b, entries1–6) and 7-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-2,4- dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carbonitrile (13b, entries 7–11) compared performance.

Entry Catalyst/Conditions [Ref.] Time (min.) Yield (%)
1 NaOH/Reflux-EtOH [35] 30 82
2 NaOH/US-H2O [35] 60 88
3 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‑7-ene (DBU) / Reflux-EtOH [44] 15 90
4 [H2-DABCO][H2PO4]2/Solvent-free, 100 °C [36] 40 95
5 [H2-DABCO][ClO4]2/Solvent-free, 100 °C [36] 50 96
6 Agar entrapped [DABCO](SO3H)2Cl2 Solvent-free -100 °C 35 98
7 Nano-MgO/H2O,80 oC [41] 15 90
8 Triethanolamine/H2O,80 °C [45] 120 92
9 Al-HMS-20/EtOH-r.t. [46] 720 92
10 [H2-DABCO][ClO4]2/EtOH, 70 °C [36] 50 95
11 Agar-entrapped [DABCO](SO3H)2Cl2/EtOH, 70°C 55 97