Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;2020:2474235. doi: 10.1155/2020/2474235

Table 2.

qRT-PCR data analysis of E6/E7-related miRNAs in different HPV subtypes.

miR-9 miR-21 miR-27b miR-34a
Compared with Normal 2ΔΔCt (P value)
 HPV16 CC (n = 44) 0.809 (0.668) 1.892 (0.106) 2.360 (0.072) 3.609 (0.005)∗∗
 HPV52 CC (n = 16) 0.438 (0.233) 1.025 (0.964) 1.409 (0.586) 1.708 (0.502)
 HPV58 CC (n = 12) 0.418 (0.096) 1.523 (0.448) 0.651 (0.515) 0.996 (0.993)
 HPV16 CIN (n = 15) 1.096 (0.860) 0.524 (0.194) 3.166 (0.076) 0.907 (0.893)
 HPV52 CIN (n = 15) 0.792 (0.630) 0.850 (0.692) 1.246 (0.721) 0.315 (0.133)
 HPV58 CIN (n = 11) 0.200 (0.003)∗∗ 0.822 (0.689) 0.534 (0.563) 0.801 (0.662)
Comparison between groups
 HPV16 CC vs. HPV52 CC 1.848 (0.444) 1.847 (0.305) 1.675 (0.433) 2.113 (0.323)
 HPV16 CC vs. HPV58 CC 1.937 (0.443) 1.242 (0.735) 3.623 (0.074) 3.625 (0.099)
 HPV52 CC vs. HPV58 CC 1.048 (0.956) 0.673 (0.656) 2.163 (0.399) 1.716 (0.596)
 HPV16 CIN vs. HPV52 CIN 1.384 (0.648) 0.616 (0.413) 2.541 (0.276) 2.883 (0.283)
 HPV16 CIN vs. HPV58 CIN 5.476 (0.034) 0.637 (0.524) 5.926 (0.125) 1.132 (0.891)
 HPV52 CIN vs. HPV58 CIN 3.957 (0.054) 1.034 (0.948) 2.333 (0.441) 0.393 (0.315)
 HPV16 CC vs. HPV16 CIN 0.739 (0.703) 3.612 (0.028) 0.745 (0.661) 3.979 (0.067)
 HPV52 CC vs. HPV52 CIN 0.553 (0.454) 1.206 (0.785) 1.130 (0.884) 5.429 (0.108)
 HPV58 CC vs. HPV58 CIN 2.088 (0.309) 1.854 (0.440) 1.219 (0.866) 1.243 (0.784)

P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01.