Table 1. Summary of the results from the 12 data sets used to test for phylogeographic breaks across the boundaries between Centres of Endemism in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa.

Genus	Family	No. species investigated (populations)	CFR sub-region	Min samples per population	Max samples per population	CoEs covered (boundaries)	Genetic break across CoEs (%)	Uncertain CoE member-ship (%)	Genetic homo-geneity across CoEs (%)	Genetic break within CoEs (%)	Primary seed dispersal mechanism	Primary pollen dispersal mechanism	Molecular methods used	Genome explored	Reference
Aspalathus	Fabaceae	1 (5)	W	3	5	2 (2)	100	0	0	0	Myrmecochory	Insect	Sanger sequencing	Chloroplast	Malgas et al. (2010)
Cyclopia	Fabaceae	1 (3)	E	24	30	1 (2)	100	0	0	0	Myrmecochory	Insect	Microsatellite	Nuclear	Niemandt et al. (2018)
Cyclopia	Fabaceae	3 (22)	W & E	6	24	5 (5)	100	0	0	3	Myrmecochory	Insect	Sanger sequencing	Chloroplast	Galuszynski & Potts (2020a, 2020b)
Erica	Ericaceae	1 (21)	W	10	30	2 (6)	86	5	9	30	Myrmecochory	Insect	Microsatellite	Nuclear	Segarra-Moragues & Ojeda (2010)
Erica	Ericaceae	1 (14)	W	1	2	4 (5)	93	7	0	15	Passive	Bird	Sanger sequencing	Nuclear and Chloroplast	Pirie et al. (2017)
Gladiolus	Iridaceae	1 (15)	W	4	11	4 (6)	81	6	13	37	Wind	Insect	Sanger sequencing and AFLP	Nuclear and Chloroplast	Rymer et al. (2010)
Leucospermum	Proteaceae	1 (4)	W	7	22	2 (2)	100	0	0	12	Serotinous	Bird	Sanger sequencing	Nuclear and Chloroplast	Johnson, He & Pauw (2014)
Protea	Proteaceae	6 (30)	W & E	20	20	7 (10)	87	3	10	23	Wind	Bird	Microsatellite	Nuclear	Prunier & Holsinger (2010)
Protea	Proteaceae	1 (19)	W & E	8	73	6 (11)	71	7	22	10	Wind	Bird	Next-Gen sequencing	Nuclear	Prunier et al. (2017)
Restio	Restionaceae	1 (10)	W & E	5	10	5 (6)	100	0	0	0	Wind	Wind	Next-Gen and Sanger sequencing	Nuclear and Chloroplast	Lexer et al. (2014)
Tetraria	Cyperaceae	1 (36)	W & E	2	24	7 (10)	75	19	6	14	Passive	Wind	Sanger sequencing	Nuclear and Chloroplast	Britton, Hedderson & Verboom (2014)