Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2020 Sep 8;32(10):108129. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108129

Table 1.

The ΔmlaF Mutant Has Increased Antibiotic Susceptibility That Is Largely Restored in the Suppressor Strain

Antibiotic WTa ΔmlaFa ΔmlaF suppa WT suppa
Chloramphenicol 12 ± 3 12 ± 1 14 ± 3 12 ± 1
Tetracycline 20 ± 1 18 ± 1 18 ± 1 19 ± 1
Streptomycin 13 ± 1 14 ± 0 14 ± 1 14 ± 1
Gentamicin 20 ± 2 28 ± 2** 21 ± 1 21 ± 3
Erythromycin 21 ± 1 27 ± 2* 21 ± 1 20 ± 4
Colistin 12 ± 0 13 ± 1 11 ± 1 11 ± 0
Polymyxin B 8 ± 0 9 ± 0 8 ± 0 9 ± 1
Daptomycin 6 ± 1 6 ± 0 6 ± 1 7 ± 1
Carbenicillin 20 ± 4 33 ± 3*** 19 ± 1 23 ± 2
Meropenem 19 ± 5 37 ± 3*** 18 ± 2 24 ± 4
Bacitracin 10 ± 0 16 ± 1**** 17 ± 1**** 9 ± 0
Copper chloride 8 ± 1 9 ± 1 9 ± 0 9 ± 0
Acetic acid 9 ± 0 8 ± 0 9 ± 1 9 ± 0
Hydrochlorous acid 8 ± 0 8 ± 0 8 ± 0 8 ± 1
Hydrogen peroxide 12 ± 1 13 ± 1 13 ± 1 12 ± 1
Paraquat 10 ± 4 18 ± 2* 13 ± 1 12 ± 3

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by a disk-diffusion assay measuring the zone of clearing. Data are two or three replicates and representative of at least two independent experiments. Significance is by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons; significant differences compared to wild-type (WT) are indicated by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

a

Mean diameter ± standard deviation (mm); limit of detection, 6 mm.