Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;13:9305–9321. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S250446

Table 1.

Summary of Key Clinical Data from Studies of Regimens Approved and Recommended in Key Guidelines for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer

Study Number of NSCLC Patients in Trial/Number with Lung SCC Patient Population Median PFS Median OS Survival HR vs Chemotherapy in Lung SCC Patients
(95% CI)
First-line treatment
Pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-024)92,93 305/56 PD-L1 TPS ≥50% 10.3 vs 6.0 months; P<0.001 30.0 vs 14.2 months; P=NR PFS 0.35 (0.17–0.71)
Pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-042)11 1274/492 PD-L1 TPS ≥1% TPS ≥1%: 5.4 vs 6.5 months; P=NR
TPS 1–49%: NR
TPS ≥1%: 16.7 vs 12.1 months; HR=0.81; P=0.0018
TPS 1–49%: 13.4 vs 12.1 months; HR=0.92
NR (SCC patients were not analyzed separately)
Pembrolizumab + platinum-based chemotherapy vs platinum-based chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-407)94 559/559 Unselected (PD-L1 TPS <1% and ≥1%) 6.4 vs 4.8 months; P<0.001 15.9 vs 11.3 months; HR=0.64; P<0.001 PFS 0.56 (0.45–0.70)
Nivolumab + ipilimumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy (CheckMate 227)13,15 PD-L1 ≥1%: 1189/350 Unselected (PD-L1 <1% and ≥1%) PD-L1 ≥1%: 5.1 vs 5.6 months; HR 0.82 PD-L1 ≥1%: 17.1 vs 14.9 months; P=0.007 PD-L1 ≥1%: OS 0.69 (0.52–0.92)
Atezolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy (IMpower110)16 554/167 PD-L1 ≥1% on TC or IC TC3 or IC3 WT: 8.1 vs 5.0 months; P=0.0070 TC3 or IC3 WT: 20.2 vs 13.1 months; HR=0.59; P=0.0106 OS 0.56 (0.23–1.37) (for TC3 or IC3 WT)
Second-line treatment
Nivolumab vs docetaxel (CHECKMATE 017)23 272/272 Unselected patients with progressive disease after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy 3.5 vs 2.8 months; P<0.001 9.2 vs 6.0 months; P<0.001 PFS 0.62 (0.47–0.81)
Ramucirumab + docetaxel vs docetaxel (REVEL)22 1253/328 Unselected patients with progressive disease after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy Overall population: 4.5 vs 3.0 months; P<0.0001 Patients with SCC: 9.5 vs 8.2 months; HR=0.88 NR (SCC patients not analyzed separately)
Atezolizumab vs docetaxel (OAK)24 850/222 Unselected patients with progressive disease after ≤2 previous chemotherapy regimens Overall population: 2.8 vs 4.0 months; P=NS Overall population: 13.8 vs 9.6 months; HR=0.73; P=0.0003 OS 0.73 (0.54–0.98)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel (KEYNOTE-010)84 1033/222 Patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and progressive disease after platinum-based chemotherapy Overall population: 3.9 vs 4.0 vs 4.0 months; P=NS Overall population: 10.4 vs 12.7 vs 8.5 months; P<0.001 for both pembrolizumab groups vs docetaxel OS 0.74 (0.50–1.09); P=NS

Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervals; HR, hazard ratio; IC, tumor-infiltrating immune cells; NR, not reported; NS, not significant; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung carcinoma; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TC, tumor cells; TPS, tumor proportion score; WT, wild-type.